TrackMRR vs FRGMNT
Updated 2026-08-04
TrackMRR is the closest competitor to FRGMNT: indie-built, iOS-first, aimed at the same person. This page tries to be genuinely useful rather than self-serving, including where TrackMRR is the better pick.
The comparison
| TrackMRR | FRGMNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Stripe | ✅ one-tap via Stripe Marketplace | ✅ paste a restricted key |
| Polar | ✅ | ❌ |
| RevenueCat | ✅ | ❌ not shipped |
| Apple App Store | via RevenueCat | ⚠️ auth only, reporting in development |
| Lemon Squeezy | ❌ | ✅ |
| Gumroad | ❌ | ✅ cash only |
| PayPal | ❌ | ✅ cash only |
| Where credentials live | Server-side, AES-256-GCM at rest | Your device Keychain only |
| Backend | Yes | None |
| Account required | Yes | No |
| Surface | Web + iOS | iOS (plus CLI and MCP) |
When TrackMRR is the better choice
You use RevenueCat. This is the clearest case. If your mobile subscriptions run through RevenueCat, TrackMRR reads them today and FRGMNT does not.
You use Polar. Not supported by FRGMNT at all.
You want one-tap Stripe setup. Connecting through the Stripe Marketplace is genuinely smoother than generating a restricted key and pasting it. FRGMNT's approach is more manual — deliberately, because it avoids an OAuth grant to a third-party server, but "more secure" and "more convenient" point in opposite directions here.
You want a web dashboard too. FRGMNT is iOS-only on the visual side.
When FRGMNT is the better choice
Your revenue is on Lemon Squeezy, Gumroad or PayPal. None are covered by TrackMRR. If you sell templates on Gumroad or use Lemon Squeezy as merchant of record, that revenue is simply invisible to it.
You don't want credentials on someone else's server. This is the real architectural difference. TrackMRR encrypts credentials at rest server-side, which is a responsible implementation — but the keys are still on a server, and a server can be breached, subpoenaed or acquired.
FRGMNT has no server. Keys are in your device Keychain and used to call each platform directly. The threat model is different in kind, not degree.
You want no account. FRGMNT has no sign-up at all.
You want it scriptable. The same revenue engine ships as a terminal CLI and an MCP server, so an AI assistant can read your MRR. More for developers.
Being fair about it
Both products are made by small teams solving the same annoyance. TrackMRR has better coverage for the mobile-and-Polar crowd and a smoother Stripe connection. FRGMNT has broader coverage for people selling digital products across several marketplaces, and a stricter privacy architecture.
If your revenue is Stripe plus RevenueCat, use TrackMRR. If it's Stripe plus Gumroad plus Lemon Squeezy, use FRGMNT. If it's Stripe only, either works and you should probably use ChartMogul's free tier.
Frequently asked
What's the main difference between TrackMRR and FRGMNT?
Platform coverage and architecture. TrackMRR covers Stripe, Polar and RevenueCat and stores credentials server-side encrypted. FRGMNT covers Stripe, the App Store, Lemon Squeezy, Gumroad and PayPal, and keeps keys on your device with no backend.
Which supports RevenueCat?
TrackMRR does today. FRGMNT lists RevenueCat and Adapty as supported in its App Store description but the shipped integrations are Stripe, App Store, Lemon Squeezy, Gumroad and PayPal.
Which is better for a mobile developer?
If your subscriptions run through RevenueCat, TrackMRR covers that directly today. FRGMNT's App Store integration currently authenticates but does not yet report sales.
Read next
- Every MRR tracking tool, comparedAn honest comparison of Baremetrics, ChartMogul, ProfitWell, TrackMRR, MRR.io and FRGMNT — what each is actual…
- Track revenue across every platform you sell onConnect Stripe, the App Store, Lemon Squeezy, Gumroad and PayPal with read-only keys for one True MRR figure. …
- Revenue tracking without handing over your dataEvery hosted analytics tool stores a copy of your revenue. Here's what that actually means, when it matters, a…